Posts Tagged ‘taxes’

How to get every stinking tax deduction

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

It hap­pens every year.  A client wan­ders in with a shoe box and a prayer and wants me to put a mir­a­cle out of my hat.  Then they get depressed or angry or both because they have to pay tax, some­times a lot of tax.

So you wanna know the secret to get­ting every stink­ing tax deduc­tion you are enti­tled to?  Rule No. 1. Keep good records. It is as sim­ple as that. (more…)

US Congress Will Punt-Legislative Update June 2011

Friday, June 17th, 2011

Last year I spent a lot of time writ­ing about how the US Con­gress had done noth­ing with respect to resolv­ing tax issues.  Why is it impor­tant for Con­gress to pass tax law? It is very hard to do tax plan­ning before the end of the year, when you do not know what taxes you have to pay.  In 2010, the exten­ders pack­age, AKA the 2010 Tax Relief Act, finally passed and was signed on Decem­ber 17 of 2010-which meant the aver­age tax­payer had very lit­tle time to engage in tax plan­ning for 2010.  Fur­ther­more many of the pro­vi­sions in that act expire at the end of this year or the next. In oth­er­words the 111th Con­gress punted and left these issues to be resolved after the next pres­i­den­tial elec­tion.  Why should the 112 Con­gress be any dif­fer­ent? (more…)

February 14, 2011 — IRS Accepting 1040 Schedule A e-file

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

In the last blog, we men­tioned that for many tax fil­ers, the IRS was delay­ing e-file accep­tance; it will not process cer­tain kinds of tax returns until their sys­tem has been mod­i­fied to incor­po­rated tax law changes passed very near the end of 2010.  The IRS has announced it will be accept­ing & begin pro­cess­ing tax returns which have a Sched­ule A, tuition & fees deduc­tion or edu­ca­tor expenses deduc­tion on Feb­ru­ary 14, 2011. 

You maybe ask­ing, “So what about these com­pa­nies say­ing they can get me my refund now?” First if you do not fit into one of the affected cat­e­gories, you can e-file now.  How­ever, if you do com­plete Form 1040 Sched­ule A obvi­ously there is no way any­one can e-file your tax return until the IRS accepts it.  What many of these ser­vices are offer­ing is some­thing called a refund antic­i­pa­tion loan (RAL)-the key word here is loan. In gen­eral these ser­vices charge a pretty hefty fee for you to get access to your refund imme­di­ately. Sec­ondly, you will owe the money for the loan if the IRS retains your refund for some rea­son. What are the rea­sons the IRS could keep your refund? If you owe back child sup­port, if you owe money on a gov­ern­ment stu­dent loan, if you owe money to a state or fed­eral agency for back taxes - these are just a cou­ple of rea­sons why your refund might not be paid out. 

In gen­eral, efil­ing is the fastest way to receive your tax refund, so if you can wait a while to receive your refund, it is prob­a­bly best to just wait until Feb­ru­ary 14, 2011 to file your taxes if you are pre­vented from doing so now.  It can save you some money. ABC does not offer RAL ser­vices, nor do we endorse the practice.

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client. 

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, cer­ti­fied finan­cial plan­ner or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to anyone else.

Hiring Your Spouse Without Running Afoul The IRS.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

On the advice of a CPA a farmer hired his wife who had worked on the fam­ily farm for years with­out pay.  All the farm and per­sonal expenses were paid from the same joint check­ing account (this is called co-mingling of funds).  The ratio­nal for sud­denly hir­ing his wife and pay­ing her a mod­est salary was so they could set up a plan to reim­burse the her as an employee for med­ical expenses.  The wife opened an account to receive her pay and to pay for the med­ical expenses.  The IRS denied the med­ical reim­burse­ments on the Sched­ule C and the tax court agreed (Shel­lito V Com­mis­sioner TC Memo 2010–41).

Why? The Eco­nomic Sub­stance Doc­trine.  The wife had work for years with no pay and the only rea­son to make the change was to receive a tax ben­e­fit.  The change in the farmer’s busi­ness prac­tice had no eco­nomic sub­stance other than the tax ben­e­fit so the ben­e­fit was denied.

Bot­tom Line: When related par­ties are involved employ­ers should fol­low all legal for­mal­i­ties and have an eco­nomic sub­stance behind them.  The farmer did not have a rea­son for sud­denly pay­ing for work that was pre­vi­ously unpaid, and did not estab­lish that the pay was rea­son­able for the work done.  Also since the farm and per­sonal expenses were paid from an account co-owned by the farmer’s wife she was essen­tially reim­burs­ing herself.

See Med­ical Insur­ance Plans for Small/Micro Busi­ness Own­ers about one way to do it properly.

See Tips to Avoid Get­ting Audited, and How to Make Your Audi­tor Drool for more infor­ma­tion about not co-mingling your funds and other ways to steer clear of an IRS audit.

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, finan­cial plan adviser, or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

Gambling Loss Deductions — Keep A Log.

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

The tax court recently ruled that gam­blers much net their win­nings and losses on a daily basis. Nev­er­the­less the rul­ing is actu­ally a good win for casual gam­blers as pre­vi­ously the IRS held that win­nings and losses must be recorded after every slot machine pull or roll of the dice.  In this case the cou­ple won $2,000 but was only up $1,100 on the day.  Since the cou­ple did not item­ize they could not take any gam­bling losses from dif­fer­ent days.  Intially the IRS said they owed tax on the entire $2,000 but the Tax Court ruled it was only $1,100. 

So lis­ten up all you gam­blers out there.  Keep a diary of all of your trips to the track, the casino etc.  This diary needs to have the type of gam­ing activ­ity, the date, the loca­tion, a state­ment of wins and loses.  Receipts and tick­ets (of both win­ners and losers–don’t trash them) should be kept to sub­stan­ti­ate the claim on your tax return later on.  Exam­ples of substatiation: 

  • For bingo you would need the num­ber of cards pur­chased, and amounts col­lected on win­ning cards.
  • For Keno you need val­i­dated Keno tick­ets, copies of the casino credit reports and casino check cash­ing records
  • For Rac­ing a record othe the num­ber of races that were bet on, amount of the wagers, and amounts lost
  • For Slots, the num­ber of the machine and win­nings by date machine was played. 
  • Tables (Black Jack, Craps, Roulette etc.), the num­ber of the table where you played, casino credit card data indi­cat­ing where the credit was issued.

Don’t pick up a bunch of losers from the ground.  The IRS will know that you did not make wagers on mul­ti­ple ponies for the same race. The time to keep the diary, is now, before you hit the mod­er­ately big jackpot. As a gam­bler you know you have up days and down days, and you should be keep­ing a gam­bling diary to sub­stan­ti­ate those days. 

For casual gam­blers win­ning days are listed in “other income” on the front of the tax return, and you will need to item­ize your tax return to take your losers, but because the gam­ing indus­try is so influ­en­cial gam­ing losses are NOT sub­ject to the 2% lim­i­ta­tion of income — they have there own spe­cial line right their on the Sched­ule A.  However you may not deduct losses on the Sched­ule A that that exceed win­nings reported in other income.  Large write-offs on a Sched­ule A may trig­ger AMT though.

In a sep­a­rate case, the Tax Court ruled there are “pro­fes­sional” gam­blers.  It was a case of a cou­ple whose gross wagers exceed $1 Mil­lion.  They spent every week­end play­ing slots that prior users had lost money on.  Although they made money at first they wound up down $200,000 with their retire­ment accounts tapped out, mort­gaged to the hilt.  Then they decided to return to casual gam­bling.  This cou­ple was allowed to claim losses up to their win­nings on  a Sched­ule C. You can bet this cou­ple had a lot of doc­u­men­ta­tion of their activities. 

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, finan­cial plan advi­sor or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.