Posts Tagged ‘carry back’

Small Business Jobs Act-Misnomer?

Thursday, October 7th, 2010

Con­gress finally did some­thing, only it wasn’t all of what we all have been wait­ing on.  There still is no estate tax fix, no AMT patch, no rein­state­ment of Bush tax cuts, no deci­sion on cap­i­tal gains taxes and other tax breaks such as teacher’s sup­plies, col­lege tuition etc. Look for these issues to be addressed one way or the other in the post-election lame duck session.

Any­way, on Sep­tem­ber 27, the Small Busi­ness Jobs Act was signed into law by Pres­i­dent Obama.  It is sup­posed to pro­vide $12 bil­lion in tax breaks for small businesses-but the “small” busi­nesses that will ben­e­fit from these tax breaks are prob­a­bly NOT con­sid­ered “small” busi­ness by your aver­age Mom & Pop operation. 

What are the pro­vi­sions (and off­sets) of this act?

  • An increase in the deduc­tion for startup costs from $5,000 to $10,000 & the startup expense maximum, before dol­lar for dol­lar decrease in the deduc­tion begins, is bumped from $50,000 to $60,000.  Need­less to say this is not of any ben­e­fit to busi­nesses that were in exis­tance at the begin­ning of 2010.
  • The write off of up to $500,000 in new equip­ment pur­chased in 2010, and the limit before dol­lar for dol­lar reduc­tion occurs raised to $2 mil­lion. Spe­cial 50% Bonus depre­ci­a­tion is also extended for 2010. Cer­tain real prop­erty is eli­gi­ble for expens­ing as well. For larger small busi­nesses these exten­sions of expens­ing ben­e­fits may be useful.  If a busi­ness is truly “small,” or a service-based busi­ness, it is not heav­ily invested in equip­ment; the increase in Sec­tion 179 and extend­ing 50% Bonus depre­ci­a­tion for another year isn’t too helpful.
  • A 5-year car­ry­back period for unused Gen­eral Busi­ness Credits.  Of course the ben­e­fit requires a busi­ness to have unused Gen­eral Busi­ness Cred­its and have prof­itable years to carry them back to.  An eli­gi­ble small busi­ness for pur­poses of this tax break is one with aver­age gross receipts of less than $50 mil­lion dol­lars over the last three years. 
  • In 2010 the Gen­eral Busi­ness Credit can off­set AMT.
  • The hold­ing period for Built-In-Gains tax for a C-corporations that con­verted to S-corporation is reduced from 10 years if the 7th year of the hold­ing period pre­cedes 2009 or 2010, and or the 5th year of the hold­ing period precedes 2011. 
  • Reduc­tion of net earn­ings from self-employment tax for insur­ance pre­mi­ums paid by the self-employed. It is a good tax break.  Of course the small busi­ness owner must be pay­ing health insur­ance pre­mi­ums to take advantage.
  • The act does have sev­eral ways to increase money avail­able to bor­row­ers, includ­ing a $30 bil­lion fund to increase lend­ing by com­mu­nity banks, and reduced fees for cer­tain SBA loans, but it has not changed lend­ing stan­dards, which have tight­ened up con­sid­er­ably since the reces­sion began. Mom & Pop’s abil­ity to bor­row tends to be pred­i­cated on their indi­vid­ual FICO scores.  Also lend­ing tends to be pred­i­cated on growth-Mom & Pop would have to pro­duce a busi­ness plan, show­ing how they intend to use the money to grow (and pro­vide jobs perhaps), but growth is not some­thing hap­pen­ing in many small busi­nesses right now.  Lenders could change their stan­dards, but they don’t have to…  How­ever a small busi­ness may be able to ben­e­fit from these loans if they can move for­ward with a coher­ent SBA loan application. 
  • For years 23% of fed­eral con­tracts have been sup­posed to go to small busi­ness.  The act is sup­posed to reduce the red tape for get­ting a fed­eral con­tract and peri­od­i­cally check on the size of fed­eral con­trac­tors to make sure they still qual­ify as a small business. 
  • Investors have a very lim­ited win­dow of oppor­tu­nity to invest in small busi­nesses and get a 100% tax break from cap­i­tal gains taxes down the road.  How­ever this tax break is for busi­nesses orga­nized as C-Corporations only-those that issue Qual­i­fied Small Busi­ness Stock.  For S-Corporations, LLCs, part­ner­ships and sole pro­pri­etor­ships there is no sim­i­lar incen­tive for investors. 
  • Busi­nesses get relief from the Tax Code require­ment that they account for how much of their employ­ees’ company-issued cell phone use is for per­sonal calls in order to deduct the full cost of the phones. Removing cell phones from listed prop­erty is a wel­come change.
  • Lim­i­ta­tion of penalty for fail­ure to dis­close cer­tain reportable trans­ac­tions on a return; the penalty is lim­ited to 75% of the reduc­tion in tax from the transaction-there are min­i­mum and max­i­mum penal­ties as well.  The change in penal­ties is retroac­tive to 2007. 
  • The IRS can levy a fed­eral con­trac­tor before a CDP hearing, although tax­pay­ers would still have a rea­son­able time for a CDP hear­ing after the levy is issued.
  • Start­ing in 2011, par­tic­i­pants in 457 plans are allowed to treat elec­tive defer­rals as Roth IRA contributions
  • Rollovers from elec­tive defer­ral plans 403(b), 401(k) and 457(b) are allowed to be treated as rollovers into Roth IRAs.
  • There is also a pro­vi­sion for more favor­able treat­ment of non­qual­i­fied annu­ity contracts
  • Guar­an­tee Fees paid by US tax­pay­ers to for­eign per­sons will be sub­ject to with­hold­ing tax.
  • Any fuel with an acid num­ber greater than 25 (crude tall oil, a waste pro­duc­tion from paper man­u­fac­tur­ing) is excluded from the def­i­n­i­tion of “cel­lu­losic bio­fuel” for pur­poses of the tax credit for alco­hol used as fuel.
  • Start­ing in 2011 there is an increase in the penalty for fail­ure to report pay­ments via 1099s from $50 to $250 and busi­nesses receiv­ing rental income are required to report pay­ments of more than $600 on Forms 1099-MISC and Form 1096 (with some excep­tions such as mil­i­tary per­son­nel tem­porar­ily rent­ing out their prin­ci­pal res­i­dences etc.). This reg­u­la­tion is on top of the  expanded 1099-MISC infor­ma­tion report­ing that was buried in the health care legislation. 

Some of these pro­vi­sions are not pro-Mom & Pop moves and do not “help Main Street busi­nesses com­pete with large cor­po­ra­tions.”  Whereas a moderate-sized busi­ness prob­a­bly has resources to han­dle reg­u­la­tory red tape — the aver­age Mom & Pop does not; respond­ing to red tape takes valu­able time and money away from their busi­ness, resources they can ill afford in the cur­rent eco­nomic climate. It is very hard for Mom & Pop to respond on the fly to con­tin­u­ously chang­ing rules for employ­ees, envi­ro­men­tal reg­u­la­tions and tax laws.

Small busi­ness cre­ates most jobs, but right now there is no con­sumer demand. Few small busi­nesses are in a posi­tion to take advan­tage of the pro-growth pro­vi­sions in the Small Busi­ness Jobs Act. It is hard to see how this act actu­ally will cre­ate jobs. For the aver­age Mom & Pop there aren’t many pro­vi­sions that ben­e­fit them. 

Of course we can always hope the Small Busi­ness Jobs Act accom­plishes it goals…

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client. 

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, cer­ti­fied finan­cial plan­ner or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

NOLs — Why You Should File Even If You Do Not Owe

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Tax day is tomor­row a short 3 hours away Phoenix local time, tomor­row most indi­vid­u­als, sole-proprietorships and part­ner­ships have to either file their 2009 tax forms or file for an exten­sion.  Either way the dead­line to pay taxes for 2009 with­out penalty is tomor­row as well.  In this timely note — we would like to take the time to answer one ques­tion we are fre­quently asked.

I do not owe any money, why should I file a tax return?

  • First and fore­most is to get the 3-year clock run­ning on the time the IRS can audit you (the  3-year clock assumes you are not com­mit­ting tax fraud or oth­er­wise sig­nif­i­cantly under-reporting your income, which can extend the clock out indef­i­nitely in some cases).
  • The sec­ond rea­son is that you may be aware of the deduc­tions that indi­cate you do not owe taxes, but if the IRS com­pletes a sub­sti­tute for return (SFR) for you they will not include any of them; by the time the IRS com­pletes an SFR you may have a hard time lay­ing hands on the doc­u­ments for all of your deduc­tions, and you will still have to deal with the IRS even if you can find all those documents.
  • A third rea­son is that there is a time limit on how far back you can go for claims of refund–if the US Trea­sury owes you a tax refund, you do not have for­ever to get it.
  • A fourth rea­son is that you may be required to file if you have suf­fi­cient income.  Not fil­ing is not an option in some cases.

But there is a new case (David­son V Com­mis­sioner, TC Memo 2100–38)  that indi­cates yet another rea­son to timely file.  Gen­er­ally a  loss is car­ried back­wards for sev­eral years and then car­ried  for­ward if there is not enough income in prior years to absorb the losses.  How­ever a tax­payer may elect to carry Net Oper­at­ing Losses (NOLs) for­ward first on a timely-filed tax return, but if the tax­payer files late they lose this option.  In this case the tax­payer sus­tained losses in 2001 & 2002 but had income in 2003.  He did not file returns until 2007.  He wanted to carry the 2001 & 2002 losses for­ward to off­set the 2003 income.  Because he filed his tax returns late he was not able to carry the losses for­ward to 2003.

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.