Archive for the ‘HR Info’ Category

Health Care Reform, What Does It Mean To You?

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

As I look over the infor­ma­tion flood­ing in I real­ize, it doesn’t affect me much for the next  four years, except per­haps my insur­ance rates may go up and the thresh­old for item­ized med­ical expenses is going to increase. I am cur­rently shop­ping for health insur­ance and the prospects are grim. For the first time I am actu­ally con­sid­er­ing going with­out cov­er­age.  Why?  Because the poli­cies I can afford right now will not pre­vent me from going bank­rupt in a med­ical emer­gency and do not pay for any­thing until an out­ra­geous fam­ily deductible is sat­is­fied.  I under­stand hav­ing insur­ance may make the dif­fer­ence between a doc­tor see­ing me and not see­ing me, but as a basi­cally healthy per­son I am seri­ously con­sid­er­ing rolling the dice, mostly because I just can’t afford it any­more. I know I am not alone. Update: I did finally get some fam­ily coverage-a plan with a high deductible that doesn’t qual­ify as an HDHP-go fig­ure, but the price is less than half of the ghastly and expen­sive plan offered by my mate’s new employer.

Does health care reform help with my cur­rent dilemma? No.  I have to wait until 2014 then maybe it helps… or not. My crys­tal ball doesn’t see that far into the future.

In my opin­ion Health Care Reform does noth­ing to address the rea­sons why health care costs have sky­rock­eted. Accord­ing to some ana­lysts insur­ance costs will con­tinue to rise.  As look what hap­pened with credit cards in advance of that reform being enacted, I expect health insur­ance providers are going to keep rais­ing rates and mess­ing around with Joe-average con­sumer until 2014 as well.

Get­ting down off my soap box and mov­ing along… Since the House Rec­on­cil­i­a­tion Act strikes out or mod­i­fies a num­ber of pro­vi­sions in the Senate’s Patient Pro­tec­tion Act to which House mem­bers had objected, the Sen­ate now must pass the “side­car” House Rec­on­cil­i­a­tion Act before it becomes law. Who knows how long that will take and what the final result will be.

Update: The Sen­ate passed a side­car that the House signed off on; Pres­i­dent Obama is signed off on it March 30, 2010.  In the “new” ver­sion — banks are being stripped of the power to do stu­dent loans-in the past the loans were guar­an­teed by the gov­ern­ment any­way, so the tax­pay­ers were tak­ing all the risk and the banks were mak­ing all the inter­est.  This bill will not change the sta­tus of exist­ing stu­dent loans. What does this have to do with health care? Not much. Why did the banks get such a sweet­heart deal in the first place? Dunno.  Weird how con­gress works.

The entire health care reform law rests on the idea that if every­body is pay­ing into the pool, costs for sicker peo­ple will come down, there­fore the law requires all indi­vid­u­als to have health insur­ance cov­er­age by 2014; those who choose not to have insur­ance would pay a tax. Indi­vid­u­als who cur­rently have cov­er­age and wish to retain that cov­er­age can do so under a “grand­fa­ther” pro­vi­sion in the heath care pack­age and the cov­er­age will be deemed to meet the individual’s respon­si­bil­ity to have health cov­er­age. A sim­i­lar grand­fa­ther pro­vi­sion applies to employ­ers that cur­rently offer cov­er­age. Indi­vid­u­als cov­ered by Medicare, Med­ic­aid, Veteran’s affairs and other gov­ern­ment pro­grams would be regarded as hav­ing essen­tial cov­er­age.  The IRS will over­see much of the imple­men­ta­tion of health care reform.

The health care reform bill means new oblig­a­tions for insur­ance com­pa­nies, new respon­si­bil­i­ties for employ­ers and even­tu­ally every indi­vid­ual will be required to have cov­er­age or pay a tax. Some of the new law’s pro­vi­sions take effect in a mat­ter of weeks. Many other fea­tures of the health care over­haul won’t take effect until 2014 or even later.

  • The law doesn’t require employ­ers to pro­vide health insur­ance ben­e­fits; how­ever, large employ­ers (orga­ni­za­tions with 50 or more employ­ees) that don’t offer insur­ance will have to pay an annual tax of $2,000 per full-time worker. Busi­nesses with more than 200 employ­ees must auto­mat­i­cally enroll work­ers into their health insur­ance plans.  Employ­ees would then be able to opt out if they choose.
  • Small-business tax cred­its of up to 35% will take effect this year to help orga­ni­za­tions with 25 or fewer employ­ees pay for afford­able employer-provided insur­ance. Update: Qual­i­fied Small Busi­ness: those with 25 or fewer employ­ees and aver­age annual wages of $50,000 or less. Start­ing in 2014 the small busi­ness will have to pay 50% to be eli­gi­ble for the credit.
  • Qual­i­fied small busi­nesses will be able to pur­chase insur­ance for employ­ees through state-based exchanges known as Small Busi­ness Health Options Pro­grams (SHOPs).  They will be designed to allow small employ­ers to pool risk together, ide­ally low­er­ing cov­er­age costs.  SHOPs must be in place by 2014. If you’re a small busi­ness and even one of your employ­ees opts out of employer-provided cov­er­age in favor of insur­ance avail­able through the state-based exchanges, you could be required to pro­vide a voucher worth the value of the per-employee pre­mi­ums you pay under your plan.
  • 2011: Employ­ees will no longer be able to use FSA funds to pay for over-the-counter med­ica­tions. The penalty for using HSA for non health care related expenses goes from 10% to 20%. 2103: The law also caps employee con­tri­bu­tions to health-related flex­i­ble spend­ing accounts (FSAs) at $2,500 per year & indexed to infla­tion thereafter.
  • All health plans must main­tain depen­dent cov­er­age for insured employ­ees’ chil­dren until they turn age 26.  This rule takes effect in Sep­tem­ber. If your busi­ness pro­vides health insur­ance cov­er­age, get ready to re-enroll many young peo­ple who left their par­ents’ fam­ily cov­er­age some­time within the last few years.
  • A high-risk insur­ance pool will be set up this spring and sum­mer to pro­vide afford­able cov­er­age for unin­sured peo­ple with pre-existing con­di­tions. Even if your com­pany does not offer insur­ance, you may get ques­tions from work­ers seek­ing cov­er­age; refer them to your state’s insur­ance commission.
  • 2011: Large employ­ers that pay for retiree drug cov­er­age (Medicare part D) must declare for account­ing pur­poses whether they intend to keep doing so; your accoun­tants will have to wait for the IRS to set the final rules first.  Also employ­ers must begin report­ing the value of health care ben­e­fits on employee W2s
  • There are new rules limit how and for whom insur­ance com­pa­nies can deny cov­er­age.  The health care reform law pro­hibits insur­ers from deny­ing cov­er­age to chil­dren based on pre-existing con­di­tions, putting life­time dol­lar lim­its on cov­er­age and can­cel­ing cov­er­age retroac­tively except in cases of fraud. Sim­i­lar rules for adults won’t kick in until 2014.
  • For some low income indi­vid­u­als and fam­i­lies, their pre­mi­ums will be capped at a per­cent­age (2–9.5%) of their income.

How do they pay for it?

  • There will be a 40 per­cent excise tax on high-dollar health insur­ance plans, to begin in 2018 payable by the insurer, which they can pass along to their customers
  • 2013: an increase in Medicare pay­roll taxes start­ing in 2013 on tax­pay­ers in the $200,000– plus income cat­e­gory ($250,000 for joint filers)
  • There will be an 10% indoor tan­ning tax begin­ning July 1, 2010.
  • New fees on cer­tain health-related indus­tries &  a dozen other “rev­enue rais­ers” are also included in the final bill.
  • 2013: While not exactly a rev­enue raiser, taxes for some will increase as the item­ized med­ical expense deduc­tion thresh­old is raised from 7.5% of AGI to 10% of AGI in 2013. For indi­vid­u­als 65 and older the change doesn’t occur until 2016.

Other Items in the act:

  • Denies Bio­fuel Credit for “Black Liquor,” pre­sum­ably because of abuses of this tax credit.
  • Cod­i­fies the Eco­nomic Sub­stance Doc­trine, the taxpayer’s eco­nomic posi­tion other than their tax posi­tion must change in a mean­ing­ful way in engag­ing in a transaction-mostly affects tax-shelter part­ner­ships & S-Corporations. Vio­la­tions are sub­ject to stiff, automatically-applied penal­ties of 20 or 40 per­cent, depend­ing on the under­ly­ing trans­ac­tion and level of disclosure.
  • Increased cor­po­rate esti­mated tax pay­ments on cor­po­ra­tions with $1 Bil­lion dol­lars in assets.
  • 2012: Adds cor­po­ra­tions to infor­ma­tion report­ing; busi­nesses will be need to get tax­payer iden­ti­fi­ca­tion info from cor­po­ra­tions they pay more than $600 a year to for ser­vices and prop­erty (that’s a lot more 1099-MISCs folks) and report those payments.

Advice to busi­nesses: Stay in con­tact with your health insur­ance bro­ker or car­rier.  They’ll have infor­ma­tion as soon as it’s avail­able. Talk to your FSA provider about imple­ment­ing changes the FSAs as soon as pos­si­ble as employ­ees are going to start want to know what they need to do now.  It’s up to you to pro­vide your employ­ees about how the new man­dates affect them, ask your ben­e­fits car­rier for mate­ri­als you can pass along to your employees.

Indi­vid­u­als should also stay in touch with their insur­ance bro­ker or carrier.

And hang on. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

What do you think about health care reform? What does health care reform mean to you?  Do you expect to receive any ben­e­fit or expe­ri­ence any harm in the near-term, or long-run?

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in. The con­tent of this blog gen­er­ally applies to busi­ness and indi­vid­ual tax­a­tion in the United States of Amer­ica.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice. Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

Home Based Technology Workers May Be Statutory Employees.

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

There are sev­eral dif­fer­ent kinds of work­ers and employ­ees.  A worker can be an Inde­pen­dent Con­trac­tor, Employee, Statu­tory Employee or Statu­tory Non-employee.

The rules for Statu­tory Employ­ees were writ­ten for

  • dri­vers (other than milk men-don’t ask me why) such as those that deliver meat, fruit, veg­eta­bles, bak­ery prod­ucts & pick-up and drop laundry
  • full-time insur­ance agents whose prin­ci­pal busi­ness is sell­ing life insur­ance and annu­ity contracts
  • full-time trav­el­ing sales peo­ple who solicit and trans­mit orders from whole­salers, retail­ers, con­trac­tors or oper­a­tors of hotels, restau­rants and other sim­i­lar establishments
  • indi­vid­u­als who work at home on mate­ri­als or goods sup­plied by an employer that must be returned to an employer when the employer fur­nishes spec­i­fi­ca­tions regard­ing the work.

Why would a busi­ness care?  Some employ­ers maybe clas­si­fy­ing these work­ers as Inde­pen­dent Con­trac­tors and think they do not need to with­hold employ­ment taxes, but an employer could be wrong.  The penal­ties for a mis­clas­si­fied a worker can be severe.  Under the rules for Statu­tory Employ­ees, the employer must with­hold Social Secu­rity and Medicare, and pay Fed­eral Unem­ploy­ment Tax (FUTA) but does not need to with­hold Fed­eral Income Tax.  Also, if the employee is a full-time insur­ance agent the employer does not have to pay FUTA. If a home worker is defined as a Statu­tory Employee by the IRS the employer must pay employ­ment taxes.

The home worker rules were orig­i­nally writ­ten for the gar­ment indus­try, where home work­ers would assem­ble dresses and the like at home from mate­ri­als sup­plied by the manufacturer/empoyer and to the manufacturer/employer’s spec­i­fi­ca­tions.  How­ever the IRS is seek­ing to expand the def­i­n­i­tion of Statu­tory Employ­ees to include cer­tain com­puter pro­gram­mers, graphic artists, and other tech­nol­ogy workers.

The key is whether such a worker could be called an inde­pen­dent con­trac­tor or not.  For home work­ers, three fac­tors come into play:

  1. Whether the work has to be sub­stan­tially per­formed by the home worker or can they del­e­gate the work to some­one else.
  2. Whether the worker has a sub­stan­tial invest­ment in facil­i­ties  in con­nec­tion with the ser­vices to be performed
  3. Whether the ser­vices are per­formed as part of a con­tin­u­ing rela­tion­ship or as a sin­gle transaction

When talk­ing about these tech­nol­ogy work­ers, the IRS has deter­mined that the tech­nol­ogy these home work­ers pro­vide: Tele­phone, com­puter, printer, online access etc. does not con­sti­tute a sub­stan­tial invest­ment unless the worker spends thou­sands of dol­lars on this tech­nol­ogy.  Also the return of mate­ri­als rules that orig­i­nally applied to gar­ment work­ers also applies here — the goods the worker mod­i­fies, or assem­bles & is required to return to the employer can include soft­ware tem­plates and other elec­tronic infor­ma­tion, that can be returned electronically.

If you have any ques­tions regard­ing whether have inde­pen­dent con­trac­tors or employ­ees, or need help with any other busi­ness or indi­vid­ual tax ques­tion, Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

March Madness-Does Your Company Need a Gaming Policy?

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

March Mad­ness is upon us and office pools are pop­ping up every­where.  It is esti­mated busi­ness will lose $3.5 bil­lion in employee pro­duc­tiv­ity as Inter­net Tracker Hit­wise stated that employ­ees spent an aver­age of 13.5 min­utes a day at ESPN.com fil­ing out their brack­ets.  While office pools are fun, they also present risks to employ­ers. Anti-gaming groups urge employ­ers not to sanc­tion gam­bling.  Gam­bling espe­cially on col­lege games is ille­gal in nearly every state, yet an esti­mated $6 bil­lion dol­lars will be ille­gally wagered dur­ing March Madness. 

 Despite this, most office pools do not affect pro­duc­tiv­ity unless they get out of hand.  Although an employer who looks the other way when office pools are cir­cu­lat­ing faces lit­tle risk of crim­i­nal charges, they should con­sid­ered hav­ing a gam­bling pol­icy in place which defines: What gam­bling is, pro­hib­ited behav­ior, and sanc­tions for vio­lat­ing the pol­icy.  Unof­fi­cially employ­ers should remind employ­ees to keep amounts low and NOT to use com­pany resources.  An employer’s pol­icy may want to make an excep­tion for sports pools, raf­fles or company-sponsored events that sup­port a char­ity.  An employer may face crit­i­cism for allow­ing office pools from employ­ees whose reli­gious beliefs pro­hibit gam­bling etc.

 If an employer decides to allow office pools, be wary of a hos­tile work envi­ron­ment claim if other employ­ees pick on employ­ees who don’t join in the “fun”.  If some­one does file a hos­tile work envi­ron­ment com­plaint due to an office pool treat the mat­ter as you would any other and dis­ci­pline accord­ing to your policy. 

 March Mad­ness can present a prob­lem for gambling-addicted employ­ees.  As of today the ADA does not rec­og­nize gam­bling addi­tion, pyro­ma­nia or klep­to­ma­nia as dis­abil­i­ties under ADA although that could change.  Employ­ers should be on the look-out for signs of gam­bling addic­tion and be pre­pared to raise this issue in a non­judg­men­tal way should it begin to affect employee pro­duc­tiv­ity. Gambling-addicted employ­ees may start miss­ing work, show­ing up late, tak­ing long lunches, be irri­ta­ble, use the office phone a lot, start ask­ing for fre­quent pay advances and may resort to fraud, theft or embez­zle­ment to feed their habit. 

 As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant, human resource spe­cial­ist, or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

Managing electronic records and email purging guidelines

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Smart com­pa­nies edu­cate their employ­ees about accept­able email use and fol­low a pol­icy of reg­u­lar computer-file purg­ing to keep the busi­ness net­work free of unnec­es­sary data storage.

If your orga­ni­za­tion thinks it may be the tar­get of a law­suit your com­pany should not fol­low a reg­u­lar purg­ing pol­icy as email can be sum­moned in lit­i­ga­tion.  Email mes­sages are offi­cial com­pany records so, your com­pany may have to put a lit­i­ga­tion hold on email dele­tion if those mes­sages could be impor­tant to the case.  The same goes for instant mes­sages (IM).  Many busi­nesses don’t have a pol­icy to han­dle elec­tronic dis­cov­ery requests and when noti­fied of a law­suit, the com­pa­nies rarely or never take steps to pre­serve elec­tronic data accord­ing to the Amer­i­can Bar Association.

Two court rul­ings send a strong mes­sage on this issue: Employ­ers who don’t take the right steps to pre­serve elec­tronic data can face big finan­cial penalties.

  • Soon after an equi­ties trader filed a sex-bias law­suit, the company’s in-house coun­sel warned employ­ees not to destroy rel­e­vant doc­u­ments.  But that warn­ing didn’t men­tion email mes­sages stored on backup tapes, which the com­pany reg­u­larly recy­cled. As a result, rel­e­vant emails were deleted and lost for­ever. A fed­eral dis­trict court said the com­pany was at fault because it had a duty to pre­serve email and other elec­tronic files, as well as back­ups of those doc­u­ments.  (Zubu­lake v.  UBS War­burg LLC, No.  02-Civ 1243, S.D.N.Y.)
  • A fed­eral court penal­ized a com­pany for fail­ing to pre­vent 11 of its top-level employ­ees from delet­ing key emails dur­ing pend­ing lit­i­ga­tion.  The com­pany kept up its prac­tice of auto­mat­i­cally delet­ing emails even after lit­i­ga­tion began, and despite a court order to pre­serve evi­dence;  the court imposed a hefty $2.75 mil­lion fine. (USA v.  Philip Mor­ris USA Inc., No.  99–2496, D.D.C.)

These cases act as a strong reminder that courts will get tough with orga­ni­za­tions that treat elec­tronic dis­cov­ery, reten­tion and preser­va­tion lightly.

The safest way to dis­pose of elec­tronic HR records is to ask ques­tions before actu­ally dis­pos­ing of elec­tronic doc­u­ments. First and fore­most, sus­pend reg­u­lar data destruc­tion if lit­i­ga­tion is likely.  A busi­ness is required to impose a lit­i­ga­tion hold on rou­tine data destruc­tion in cer­tain cir­cum­stances.  This duty to pre­serve comes into play when the busi­ness receives notice that an admin­is­tra­tive or judi­cial claim has been filed against the orga­ni­za­tion and, even sooner, if the orga­ni­za­tion has rea­son to believe that a law­suit is on the hori­zon.  But the duty to pre­serve doesn’t extend to every doc­u­ment and bit of data.  A com­pany only has to save data only if it’s been pre­pared by or for employ­ees who will be key play­ers in the lit­i­ga­tion.  Rule of thumb: When in doubt, don’t throw it out. Before purg­ing email or other files, sort through them to deter­mine which items could have legal sig­nif­i­cance.  Print them out and file the hard copies.  A busi­ness should con­sult with their IT experts about pro­ce­dures to pro­tect data from being arbi­trar­ily deleted or overwritten.

Other mea­sures a com­pany should take:

  • Com­pa­nies should estab­lish document-retention peri­ods.  An orga­ni­za­tion must retain cer­tain doc­u­ments even with­out the threat of lit­i­ga­tion.  For exam­ple, all employ­ers must retain fed­eral pay­roll tax records for at least four years from the due date of the tax return they are likely to be used on.  e.g. 2009 pay­roll tax records need to be retained through April 15, 2014.  Truck­ing com­pa­nies must hold onto employee alco­hol test results for five years.  There are other gov­ern­ment man­dated reten­tion rules for tax records, prop­erty dis­posal records, and other employ­ment records.  A com­pany should know what they are and fol­low them.
  • Com­pa­nies should apply a time limit on reten­tions of data not reg­u­lated by gov­ern­ment rules. Key busi­ness doc­u­ments should likely be retained indef­i­nitely.  Email in acces­si­ble for­mat, how­ever, should be sub­ject to a short reten­tion period of about 30 days.
  • Com­pa­nies should have an elec­tronic com­mu­ni­ca­tions pol­icy and train­ing.  Busi­nesses should train man­agers and employ­ees on their elec­tronic com­mu­ni­ca­tion pol­icy and make them aware that emails are offi­cial cor­re­spon­dence that can be called into evi­dence dur­ing a law­suit.  FAQs are a good way to describe such a policy.
  • Com­pa­nies should apply and enforce their pol­icy con­sis­tently.  Incon­sis­tency, say, for exam­ple, let­ting high-level employ­ees destroy data more fre­quently than pol­icy states, could put the com­pany at risk of a charge of bad-faith evi­dence destruction.

As always, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  If you need help Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.

Correcting Employment Tax Errors Without Penalty or Interest

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Employ­ment tax forms are cor­rected by fil­ing a 941-X.  The due date of the amended tax return is the same as the due date of the quar­ter in which the error was discovered.

e.g.  L-corporation dis­cov­ers in Feb­ru­ary that it under-reported and under-paid employ­ment taxes for the 4th quar­ter of the pre­ced­ing year.  Since the error was dis­cov­ered in Feb­ru­ary the amended return and tax is not due until April 30th.

How­ever, Inter­est will be charged if you do not file the amended tax return AND pay the taxes by the due date.

NOTE: If you do not pay the taxes before the IRS asks for them, inter­est will be charged, there­fore it is to your company’s advan­tage to report the error and pay the taxes when the mis­take is discovered.

If you need help with this issue or any other, remem­ber, small busi­ness ser­vices and tax­a­tion are our busi­ness.  Please give Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing a call.  We would love to engage you as a client.

The usual dis­claimers: Although ABC has made every effort to insure the accu­racy of Taxes, Tips and Tools, mis­in­for­ma­tion, dis­in­for­ma­tion, changes, mis­takes, typos and hack­ers hap­pen, there­fore Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC takes no respon­si­bil­ity for any action taken or results based on the infor­ma­tion sup­plied here in.  Inter­nal Rev­enue Ser­vice Cir­cu­lar 230 Dis­clo­sure:  As pro­vided for in Trea­sury reg­u­la­tions, advice (if any) relat­ing to fed­eral taxes that is con­tained in this com­mu­ni­ca­tion (includ­ing attach­ments) is not intended or writ­ten to be used, and can­not be used for the pur­pose of (1) avoid­ing penal­ties under the Inter­nal Rev­enue Code or (2) pro­mot­ing, mar­ket­ing or rec­om­mend­ing to another party any plan or arrange­ment address herein.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC cur­rently does not have a cer­ti­fied pub­lic accoun­tant or an attor­ney on staff; this infor­ma­tion is purely for edu­ca­tional pur­poses and not to be con­strued as legal or finan­cial advice.  Art & Busi­ness Con­sult­ing LLC and its employ­ees, mem­bers and asso­ciates are not engage to prac­tice law; you always should dis­cuss legal mat­ters with your attor­ney before talk­ing to any­one else.